The Supreme Court is considering whether to strike down a Mississippi law that counts mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day even if they arrive up to five business days later. The court heard arguments Monday on the lawfulness of this grace period, a practice currently in use in multiple states. A ruling against the grace period could reshape voting procedures across the country before this year's midterm elections and beyond.
Election officials across multiple states are already preparing contingency plans for the possibility that the court will eliminate grace periods entirely. The timing creates urgent pressure: if the justices rule against the practice, states would need to implement new ballot-counting procedures quickly to comply with any decision. Officials have begun reviewing their current mail-in ballot systems and considering how to notify voters of potential changes to voting deadlines and ballot receipt windows.
Fact-checkers have examined numerous claims made by Trump and his supporters about mail-in ballot security, including whether mail-in ballots substantially increase chances of voter fraud. These claims have not been substantiated.
The Supreme Court is considering whether to strike down a Mississippi law that counts mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day even if they arrive up to five business days later. The court heard arguments Monday on the lawfulness of this grace period, a practice that more than a dozen states currently allow. A ruling against the grace period could reshape voting procedures across the country before this year's midterm elections and beyond.
Election officials across multiple states are already preparing contingency plans for the possibility that the court will eliminate grace periods entirely. The timing creates urgent pressure: if the justices rule against the practice, states would need to implement new ballot-counting procedures quickly to comply with any decision. Officials have begun reviewing their current mail-in ballot systems and considering how to notify voters of potential changes to voting deadlines and ballot receipt windows.
President Donald Trump has repeatedly attacked the legitimacy of mail-in ballots through false and misleading claims, according to fact-checkers who have inspected 16 rumors about mail voting. Trump has railed against mail-in ballots since falsely claiming he lost the 2020 election to former President Joe Biden due to fraud. Yet in March, Trump's decision to vote by mail in a Florida election made headlines, highlighting a contradiction in his public stance. Trump has a documented history of voting by mail himself while simultaneously pushing Congress to heavily restrict the practice for other voters.
Fact-checkers have examined numerous claims made by Trump and his supporters about mail-in ballot security, including whether mail-in ballots substantially increase chances of voter fraud. These claims have not been substantiated. The scrutiny reflects the polarized debate surrounding mail voting, even as millions of Americans rely on it as a voting method.
Highlighted text was flagged by the council. Tap to see feedback.