Council News
Link copied

DOJ Error Undermines Basis for Immigration Courthouse Arrests

Rights & Justice· 5 sources ·Updated 5h ago
Left
Center
Right
See why this story leans left

After review, the Council found the article leans left due to its emphasis on individual cases like Dylan Contreras and Mohommad Nazeer Paktyawal, framing ICE actions as having a significant 'human cost' and highlighting advocates' criticisms while downplaying the DOJ's explanation of 'agency attorney error.'

See how other outlets covered this
NBC News Leans Left
DOJ says it erroneously relied on ICE memo to justify immigration courthouse arrests
NBC News focuses on the Trump administration's erroneous reliance on an ICE memo to justify arrests at immigration courthouses, highlighting the impact on immigrants attending hearings. The language emphasizes the administration's mistake and the resulting consequences.
Bloomberg Center
DOJ Blames ICE for ‘Regrettable Error’ in Immigration Lawsuit
Bloomberg frames the story as a legal and procedural error, emphasizing the Justice Department's admission and its blaming of ICE for providing incorrect information. The tone is neutral and focuses on the legal implications and accountability.
See the council’s votes

DOJ admitting it erroneously relied on an ICE memo to justify immigration courthouse arrests reveals new information about the legal basis for these arrests.

DOJ acknowledges it erroneously relied on ICE memo to justify immigration courthouse arrests. New information revealing a legal error in enforcement practices affecting how immigration enforcement operates.

New information from the DOJ revealed an error in relying on an ICE memo for immigration policies, providing facts that alter understanding of past enforcement practices.

See bias & truth review

DOJ's Filing Exposes Reliance on Wrong ICE Memo

The Justice Department admitted in a Tuesday court filing that it had wrongly used an ICE memo to defend arrests at immigration courthouses, as part of a lawsuit by immigrant rights groups. Federal prosecutors cited the "2025 ICE Guidance" to justify deploying ICE agents at these locations, but the memo does not apply to immigration courts.

How the Mistake Alters Court Proceedings

Prosecutors acknowledged the "material mistaken statement" in their filing, stating that briefs and the court's September opinion must now be reconsidered. As a result, the plaintiffs' claims under the Administrative Procedure Act against ICE will require re-briefing, delaying resolution of the federal case.

Consequences for Individuals Like Dylan Contreras

Dylan Contreras, a 20-year-old New York City public school student from Venezuela, was arrested at a routine hearing in May after seeking a green card. His detention lasted ten months, forcing him to miss high school milestones despite having no criminal history. New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani noted on social media that Contreras' experience highlights the human cost of such tactics, as ICE continues enforcement that lawyers argue violates asylum seekers' rights.

Advocates' Reactions to the Disclosure

Amy Belsher, an attorney for the New York Civil Liberties Union representing the plaintiffs, described the revelation as a "shocking revelation" in a statement. She pointed to it as evidence of ICE's "brazen disregard for the lives of immigrants," emphasizing that people should not face arrest for attending court. On the other side, the Justice Department maintained in its filing that the error does not undermine arguments for ICE's courthouse arrests, blaming the mistake on "agency attorney error" within ICE.

ICE's Broader Enforcement Practices Under Scrutiny

Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner threatened to arrest ICE agents at the city's airport on Wednesday, citing their role in security amid TSA shortages. In a separate incident, Mohommad Nazeer Paktyawal, a 41-year-old Afghan veteran arrested by ICE on March 13, died in custody less than 24 hours later from what advocates call preventable causes, including denied access to his inhaler. ICE described Paktyawal as a criminal illegal alien and alleged he committed SNAP fraud in September 2025 and theft in November. But Paktyawal had a pending asylum case and had already undergone a USCIS asylum interview. Attorney Erick Resek argued that the chaotic legal landscape for Afghan refugees made it wrong to treat benefits issues as proof of fraud.

Get today’s full briefing

5 stories left to complete

Sources (5)

Cross-referenced to ensure accuracy

Never miss a story.
Get the full experience. Free on iOS.
Download for iOS